On first glance, you seem to be on the right track but your argument leans too heavily on the scientific method, which may not be directly applicable to all learning contexts. In creative fields, for example, iterative trial and error without specific hypotheses can be a crucial part of the creative process, leading to innovation and artistic breakthroughs.

Moreover, you suggest that experimentation should always be based on prior knowledge and hypotheses. However, this perspective might undervalue the role of exploratory learning, where unguided experimentation can lead to serendipitous discoveries. For instance, some scientific breakthroughs have resulted from unstructured exploration without predefined hypotheses.